Foreign economic activity as a management system: interests, conflicts and practical solutions

Foreign economic activity as a management system: interests, conflicts and practical solutions
Most Popular
03.10
A new week on marketplaces: commissions, books, coffee shops, and new rules
03.10
The electronic bill of lading will become mandatory from September 1, 2026
03.10
Digital logistics instead of fines: how technology is changing transportation control
03.10
Import is not just a purchase: why foreign economic activity requires a different approach
03.10
How Money Transfer helps Businesses bypass sanctions barriers and pay abroad
03.10
The grey area is closed: how labeling changed import rules in 2025
Foreign economic activity is not just about supplies. This is a complex puzzle of the interests of the state, contractors, suppliers and consumers. We understand how to manage conflicts and build an effective foreign economic activity system.

Foreign economic activity has long gone beyond the simple "bought—brought" scenario. Today, foreign economic activity is a complex system of interaction with various players: government agencies, foreign suppliers, logistics specialists, customs brokers and, of course, internal divisions of companies. They all act within their own goals, and often these goals do not coincide, but conflict.

It is important for the importer to receive the goods on time and with an understandable final cost. He wants to minimize risks and transfer operational tasks to contractors. The supplier, in turn, prefers not to delve into the regulatory intricacies of another country. His task is to ship the goods and receive payment, without going into the details of packaging or labeling.

Logistics companies and brokers aim for a stable flow, avoiding non-standard operations that can lead to problems at customs or with documents. Government agencies are interested in collecting payments, complying with regulations, and improving supply traceability. And consumers demand low prices and constant availability of products.

These disagreements create conflict lines: the importer may enter into a dispute with the government over speed and formalities, with the contractor over the area of responsibility, with the supplier over defects or documentation. Internal conflicts in companies create additional difficulties when procurement, logistics, and finance pursue different KPIs.

However, these conflicts are manageable. The article offers a practical methodology for balancing interests through four decision blocks:

The first is a competent transaction architecture. Attention to Incoterms, payment terms, and delivery wording avoids many risks and delays.

The second is working with contractors. The separation of functions between mass and project deliveries, clear SLAs, transparent calculations, and an understanding of each provider's limitations help avoid misunderstandings.

The third is supplier management. Preliminary verification of documents, clear language instructions, and recording the stages of acceptance and packaging reduce the likelihood of problems at the border.

The fourth is internal coordination. The implementation of the RACI matrix, the maintenance of a calendar of key milestones and the accurate calculation of the total cost of delivery allow the company to synchronize the actions of all departments.

Foreign economic activity is not just logistics, but a strategic function of a business. And the approach to it should be appropriate: with an understanding of the roles, risks, processes and goals of all participants.