The court confirmed that forwarding documents can be used to confirm the customs value.

The court confirmed that forwarding documents can be used to confirm the customs value.
Most Popular
14.11
Russia and China have agreed to strengthen cooperation within the framework of BRICS and SCO
14.11
Experts: Argentina's refusal to join BRICS will cost the economy 1% of GDP annually
14.11
The first international blockchain conference was held in Iran: Iran aspires to become the center of the BRICS digital economy
14.11
Chinese diplomat: Ethiopia's joining BRICS has strengthened its influence and opens up new opportunities for the Global South
14.11
Russia and Ethiopia tripled trade turnover in 2025: the key role of fertilizers and digital projects
13.11
The EEC clarified what is considered an electronic trading platform for customs clearance
The Moscow Arbitration Court confirmed that the declarant can use the forwarder's documents to confirm the customs value of the shipment. The requirement of the customs office to provide payments from the carrier is recognized as illegal.

The Moscow Arbitration Court has made a decision that is important for all participants in foreign economic activity: now forwarding documents are recognized as sufficient to confirm the customs value of transportation.

The reason was a case in which the customs authority demanded that the importer calculate the costs directly from the railway carrier. However, the court recognized these requirements as unlawful, stating that the declarant is obliged to submit only those documents that he actually possesses within the framework of his contractual relations.

The company provided a complete package of documents from the forwarder — a contract, invoices and certificates confirming payment for services. The court noted that the forwarder independently forms tariffs based not only on transportation costs, but also on complex economic factors, and therefore his documents are sufficient evidence when calculating the customs value.

The arbitration referred to the provisions of the EAEU Customs Code, which stipulates that the declarant must submit documents received under contracts concluded by him. If there are no direct contracts with the carrier, the requirement to provide their documents is excessive and illegal.

This decision was a continuation of the established judicial practice, which protects businesses from excessive requirements of customs authorities and reduces the administrative burden on participants in foreign economic activity. Experts believe that it strengthens legal certainty in matters of customs value confirmation, making the process more transparent and predictable.