The court confirmed that forwarding documents can be used to confirm the customs value.

The court confirmed that forwarding documents can be used to confirm the customs value.
Most Popular
24.02
UPD and UPD DOP on WB and Ozon: how to close a month without discrepancies
24.02
Ozon, WB, Yandex: February rules that eat up margins
24.02
Lula de Silva: the expansion of BRICS is changing the rules of global trade
24.02
BRICS and the "dollar-free payment system": what is actually confirmed
24.02
Brazil's Central Bank Accelerates Rules for Crypto Infrastructure Until 2027
23.02
The Ministry of Industry and Trade is cutting parallel imports again: there will be fewer brands
The Moscow Arbitration Court confirmed that the declarant can use the forwarder's documents to confirm the customs value of the shipment. The requirement of the customs office to provide payments from the carrier is recognized as illegal.

The Moscow Arbitration Court has made a decision that is important for all participants in foreign economic activity: now forwarding documents are recognized as sufficient to confirm the customs value of transportation.

The reason was a case in which the customs authority demanded that the importer calculate the costs directly from the railway carrier. However, the court recognized these requirements as unlawful, stating that the declarant is obliged to submit only those documents that he actually possesses within the framework of his contractual relations.

The company provided a complete package of documents from the forwarder — a contract, invoices and certificates confirming payment for services. The court noted that the forwarder independently forms tariffs based not only on transportation costs, but also on complex economic factors, and therefore his documents are sufficient evidence when calculating the customs value.

The arbitration referred to the provisions of the EAEU Customs Code, which stipulates that the declarant must submit documents received under contracts concluded by him. If there are no direct contracts with the carrier, the requirement to provide their documents is excessive and illegal.

This decision was a continuation of the established judicial practice, which protects businesses from excessive requirements of customs authorities and reduces the administrative burden on participants in foreign economic activity. Experts believe that it strengthens legal certainty in matters of customs value confirmation, making the process more transparent and predictable.