• USD/RUB USD/RUB 83.48
  • EUR/RUB EUR/RUB 94.32
  • CNY/RUB CNY/RUB 12.43
  • Bitcoin Bitcoin BTC $84863
  • Ethereum Ethereum ETH $2681
  • Ripple Ripple XRP $1.49
  • Solana Solana SOL $119.67
  • Cardano Cardano ADA $0.24
  • USD/RUB USD/RUB 83.48
  • EUR/RUB EUR/RUB 94.32
  • CNY/RUB CNY/RUB 12.43
  • Bitcoin Bitcoin BTC $84863
  • Ethereum Ethereum ETH $2681
  • Ripple Ripple XRP $1.49
  • Solana Solana SOL $119.67
  • Cardano Cardano ADA $0.24

India changes tone in Digital Duties Dispute

India changes tone in Digital Duties Dispute
Most Popular
02.10
Wildberries has launched a multi-level loyalty program for sellers
02.10
The Federal Tax Service named five typical errors when submitting the DPP since July 2026
02.10
India has extended the RoDTEP scheme until December 31, 2026 with no change in rates
01.10
Vologda Customs Office changes the code from October 1, 2026
01.10
The VAT exemption for the import of six types of equipment will be abolished from 2027
01.10
Refunds on marketplaces: how to keep records correctly and not overstate revenue
India has softened the rhetoric around the WTO moratorium on duties in digital trade. New Delhi is ready to discuss a limited extension of the regime, but maintains a tough stance on attempts to consolidate it on a permanent basis.

India is making a more flexible move in one of the most sensitive global trade discussions. At the WTO negotiations, New Delhi made it clear that it could agree to a two-year extension of the moratorium on levying duties on electronic transmissions. At the same time, the Indian side maintains a principled position: the issue cannot be closed forever without a new assessment of the consequences for developing economies.

This dispute has long ceased to be a technical one for global trade. We are talking about the right of states to determine the future of the digital market, the tax base, the regime of cross-border e-commerce and the balance between the interests of global platforms and national economies. India has consistently stressed that an indefinite ban on such duties limits the space for trade policy and deprives countries of some potential revenue.

The willingness to discuss a short extension shows that New Delhi does not intend to disrupt the negotiation process. India reserves a maneuver for itself and at the same time fixes the red line: the decision must take into account the interests of the developing world and not turn into a unilateral victory for the largest digital players. This approach is especially important for the BRICS countries, which are increasingly building their own ecosystems of e-commerce, payments and cross-border services.

For businesses, this means one thing: digital commerce remains a zone of high regulatory uncertainty. While the largest economies are arguing about the rules, platforms, merchants and technology companies are forced to consider the risk of changing the regime of cross-border transactions. In this configuration, India acts as a country that is trying to transfer the dispute from the plane of ideology to the plane of trade sovereignty and long-term settlement.