• USD/RUB USD/RUB 82.55
  • EUR/RUB EUR/RUB 92.40
  • CNY/RUB CNY/RUB 12.38
  • Bitcoin Bitcoin BTC $73889
  • Ethereum Ethereum ETH $2053
  • Ripple Ripple XRP $1.06
  • Solana Solana SOL $83.91
  • Cardano Cardano ADA $0.18
  • USD/RUB USD/RUB 82.55
  • EUR/RUB EUR/RUB 92.40
  • CNY/RUB CNY/RUB 12.38
  • Bitcoin Bitcoin BTC $73889
  • Ethereum Ethereum ETH $2053
  • Ripple Ripple XRP $1.06
  • Solana Solana SOL $83.91
  • Cardano Cardano ADA $0.18

Courts return fees for lowering loan rates to borrowers

Courts return fees for lowering loan rates to borrowers
Most Popular
11.11
Russia and Abkhazia agree to speed up customs clearance of tangerines and wine
11.11
Kazakhstan is changing toll payments for trucks: foreign carriers will pay more
11.11
China's foreign trade grew by 31.2% in October 2026
11.11
Former director paid 88,300 roubles in fines because of a register entry
11.11
Ezhou airport in Wuhan opened cargo routes to Africa and South America
11.11
Simplified tax system in St Petersburg: the 7% rate to become a thing of the past from 2027
In 2026, Russian courts are widely siding with borrowers in disputes over refunds of fees for lowering loan rates. Sber, VTB, Alfa-Bank and Gazprombank have been affected. Entrepreneurs who took loans with paid rate-reduction options have a real chance to recover significant amounts or keep the reduced rate.

In 2026 cases alone, at least eight disputes against Sber, five against VTB and four against Alfa-Bank have been won. Courts refunded the cost of paid options, recalculated interest and kept the loan discount.

Figures from specific cases show the scale: in one dispute with VTB, the borrower got back 174 thousand roubles and kept a rate of 24% per annum — the bank insisted on 35.7%. In a case against Alfa-Bank, the court excluded 156 thousand roubles from the loan principal. The largest recovery was about 946 thousand roubles from Gazprombank, including interest and a fine; the option itself had cost the borrower 510 thousand roubles.

There are several grounds for a refund. Courts find the payment unlawful if consent to the service was ticked automatically, the borrower was not offered an alternative without extra charge, or the service had no independent consumer value. Article 16 of the Consumer Protection Law expressly prohibits banks from pre-ticking a client's consent to additional services. Since July 1, 2025, the Bank of Russia mortgage standard additionally prohibits any fees for lowering the rate on mortgage products.

The practical procedure is as follows: first request the loan documents and rate calculation from the bank, then send a written claim. For claims of up to 500 thousand roubles, a preliminary stage is mandatory — an appeal to the financial ombudsman; only after their decision can one go to court.

However, there is no guaranteed result. If the programme terms were transparently disclosed and the client took the service voluntarily, the court may refuse both a fee refund and keeping the reduced rate at the same time: one will have to choose. Entrepreneurs who took loans with such options to finance purchases or replenish working capital should check their loan documents for automatically included paid services — 2026 court practice is developing in favour of borrowers.

Deliver2 channel in MAX
A channel about foreign trade news: current routes, up-to-date payment methods, market participants opinions, interviews and podcasts.

Related news: